In today’s fast-paced and competitive business environment, setting goals and objectives is crucial for success. Employees working with a goal-oriented enterprise are 6.7 times more likely to be proud of the entity as compared to others. Hence, it is crucial for your business to have a well-rounded goal-setting strategy in place.
Two popular goal-setting methodologies in present times are OKR and SMART. OKR stands for Objectives and Key Results, while SMART stands for Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound. Both methods have their own unique approaches and benefits. Selecting between OKR vs SMART goals depends on the needs and objectives of your company.
When you compare the two, you will realize that SMART goals focus on creating specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound goals. These goals provide clarity, accountability, and a way to measure progress. On the other hand, OKRs focus on setting ambitious and challenging objectives that are aligned with the overall vision and mission of the company. OKRs also include measurable key results and a focus on continuous improvement.
Read on for a detailed comparison of OKR vs SMART goals, their advantages and disadvantages, and how to choose the right method for your organization. By understanding these methodologies, your company can optimize the goal-setting process and increase the chances of success in hyper-competitive markets.
| Do You Know!
Employees who understand how their goals are related to the broader mission are more enthusiastic and have a 10x higher probability of being motivated. |
What is Objective and Key Result (OKR)?
The Objective and Key Result (OKR) is a goal-setting methodology used by leaders to set and achieve company objectives. It involves defining a clear objective and identifying measurable key results to track progress towards achieving the specified objective.
The objective is a short statement that defines a specific and ambitious goal that the organization wants to achieve. The key results are specific, measurable outcomes that are used to measure progress towards achieving the objective. Key results should be quantifiable and time-bound, and they should represent a significant step towards achieving the objective.
OKRs are typically set at multiple levels of an organization, starting from the top-level objectives down to individual employee goals. Fast-growing tech companies often use OKRs, but they can be applied to businesses of any size and in any industry. If you are still struggling with multiple spreadsheets to manage your OKRs, then check out this incredible OKR platform that is taking the market by storm.
Here are some examples of OKRs that a business might set:
- Objective: Increase customer satisfaction
Key Results:
- Achieve a customer satisfaction score of 95% or above.
- Decrease customer complaints by 33%.
- Objective: Increase revenue from new customers
Key Results:
- Acquire 400 new customers in the next quarter.
- Increase conversion rate on the company website by 30%
- Objective: Improve employee productivity
Key Results:
- Reduce the average time to complete tasks by 25%.
- Improve employee satisfaction score by 20%.
What are SMART Goals?
SMART goals are a popular framework used by businesses to set goals that are clear, well-defined, and achievable. To be considered SMART, every goal must be:
- Specific: The goal should be clear and well-defined, with a specific outcome in mind to avoid ambiguity.
- Measurable: The goal should have a way to measure progress and success to enable evaluation of progress towards the goal.
- Achievable: The goal should be realistic and achievable based on the resources and time available.
- Relevant: The goal should be relevant to the overall mission and objectives of the organization.
- Time-bound: The goal should have a specific deadline or timeframe in which it should be achieved.
By setting SMART goals, you can improve the focus of employees and increase the chances of success. This framework is widely used in many industries and can be applied to both short-term and long-term goals.
Goal 1:
- Specific: Boost monthly sales revenue.
- Measurable: By 20%.
- Achievable: By implementing a new marketing campaign and increasing the sales team by three members.
- Relevant: To support the company’s growth and profitability objectives.
- Time-bound: Within the next 12 months.
Goal 2:
- Specific: Reduce customer complaints.
- Measurable: By 30%.
- Achievable: By training customer service representatives in conflict resolution and improving the company’s returns policy.
- Relevant: To improve customer satisfaction and loyalty.
- Time-bound: Within the next six months.
Goal 3:
- Specific: Improve employee satisfaction.
- Measurable: By increasing the employee satisfaction score by 10%.
- Achievable: By conducting an employee satisfaction survey, identifying key areas of improvement, and implementing changes.
- Relevant: To improve employee retention and productivity.
- Time-bound: Within the next year.
Differences between OKR and SMART Goals
OKR (Objectives and Key Results) and SMART Goals (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound) are frameworks used for goal setting. While they share some similarities, there are also some key differences between the two. Here is a comparison of OKR vs SMART goals:
| Parameters |
OKR |
SMART |
| Applicability |
When it comes to OKR, this goal approach can be applied to the entire company. |
SMART goals are more suitable for an individual person or a small team. |
| Time Frame |
When it comes to setting long-term goals, OKR is preferable. |
The SMART approach is considered to be more reliable for short-term goals. |
| Flexibility |
OKR is considered more flexible as new changes and updates can be adapted, and furthermore, it is possible to set OKR on a monthly or even yearly basis |
The SMART approach doesn’t have this feature. In this approach, companies do not change the SMART goals frequently and usually set yearly or half-yearly goals. |
| Access |
OKR is more public, which means that the OKR framework promotes openness by making OKR progress easily accessible to all employees |
SMART goals tend to be more private until and unless the company decides to make them public. |
| Time Taken |
Determining and defining OKR consumes less time compared to SMART goals. |
SMART goals need more time because they need to be more specific when finalizing the goals. |
| Metrics |
OKRs have multiple metrics to evaluate success. The OKRs have an all-encompassing view of success. OKRs place a greater emphasis on tracking progress towards achieving the key results |
SMART objectives only use one metric. SMART objectives are focused on a specific set of factors. SMART goals tend to focus more on the outcome of the goal itself. |
| Accountability |
OKRs usually have a greater emphasis on accountability and transparency. Key results are shared publicly, which means that progress towards objectives can be tracked by everyone in the organization. |
SMART goals tend to be more private and are usually set between a manager and an employee. |
| Focus |
OKRs focus more on setting objectives that are ambitious and aspirational while also ensuring that they are measurable. |
SMART goals focus on setting specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound goals. The emphasis is on setting goals that are very clear and easy to measure. |
Similarities Between OKR vs SMART Goals
OKR and SMART goals are effective tools for goal setting and can help individuals and organizations to achieve their objectives. While there are some differences between the two frameworks when you compare OKR vs SMART goals, they share many similarities and can be used together to create a comprehensive goal-setting strategy.
Here are some similarities between the two:
- Focus on achieving goals: Both frameworks have the primary focus of setting and achieving goals. They offer a structured approach to defining and measuring progress towards goals.
- Importance of measurability: Both OKRs and SMART goals emphasize the necessity of setting measurable goals. They require specific, measurable, and quantifiable objectives that can be tracked and measured over time.
- Clarity of goals: Both frameworks emphasize the importance of clarity in goal setting. They need clear and concise objectives that are easily understood by everyone involved.
- Time-bound: Both OKRs and SMART goals are time-bound. This means they are set for a specific period and have a deadline for completion. It helps to create a sense of urgency and ensures that progress is made towards achieving the goals.
| Do You Know!
Most companies implement OKRs by involving their leadership team, which typically comprises either the executive management or the board of directors. |
OKR vs SMART Goals: Which One to Choose?
The choice between OKR vs SMART goals depends on the needs and the goals of your enterprise. Here are some factors to consider when choosing between the two:
- Ambition: If you want to set ambitious goals, then OKRs may be the better choice as they allow for more flexibility. These goals, in turn, encourage teams to aim high and push themselves beyond what they may have initially thought possible.
- Clarity: If your company desires clear, specific, and measurable goals, then SMART goals may be the better choice. They provide a clear framework for setting goals that are specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound.
- Timeframe: If your enterprise is focused on short-term goals, such as quarterly or annual goals, then SMART goals may be the better choice. If you want to set long-term goals with more flexibility, then OKRs may be the better choice.
- Accountability: If your company values accountability and transparency, then OKRs may be the better choice. Results are often shared publicly, which helps everyone in the organization track progress and hold each other accountable. SMART goals tend to be more private and focused on individual or team performance.
| Did You Know!
According to a study, individuals who documented their objectives, created a list of actions to achieve them, and shared weekly progress updates with a friend accomplished their goals in 76% of cases. This success rate is 33% higher than that of individuals with unrecorded goals |
Last Few Words
OKRs are great for setting ambitious, aspirational goals that require a collaborative effort from multiple teams. They are designed to be aggressive yet attainable, and they provide a clear path to success by outlining specific, measurable outcomes that need to be achieved.
On the other hand, SMART goals are useful when you break down a larger goal into smaller, more manageable objectives. They are particularly useful when you need to track progress over time and ensure that everyone involved is working towards the same outcome.
It’s important to weigh each framework’s pros and cons and decide which will best help you achieve your desired outcomes. Consider the size of your organisation, the complexity of your goals, and the level of collaboration required to succeed. With the right framework in place, you can set achievable and meaningful goals and track your progress towards success.
Check out PeopleStrong to make better talent decisions
We are in an era of accelerated digitization and for companies to build a workforce for the future – there are a slew of factors that companies need to execute with various stakeholders including people leaders, management, and employees.
PeopleStrong’s AI-powered, comprehensive, integrated Talent Operating System could be just the solution that you are looking for to win this talent war.
An Integrated Talent Management Suite can help you:
- Create a seamless hiring experience that both your recruiters and candidates will love and results in 50% higher offer acceptance than industry standards
- Create a fully automated, hyper-personalized onboarding experience that reduces 50% joining time
- Build an efficient and high-performance culture to unleash the true potential of your workforce
- Craft personalized career and skill advancement paths for employees
Leverage powerful insights from real-time talent analytics towards better talent decisions with agility, and at scale
